Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to refactorers-journal.com

Refactorer's Journal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
refactoredcodes.com
Refactored Codes
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
paulisaris.com
Paul Isaris | A Developer's Journey
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
refactoringguru.com
Refactoring and Design Patterns
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
simchagreenbaum.com
My Coding Journey
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
hojjatk.com
This Developer's Planet
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
egisca.com
Egisca – Software Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
cosycoding.com
Cosycoding | I write about my journey as software developer.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
refactormycode.com
Recent codes - RefactorMyCode.com
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
lonecpluspluscoder.com
The Lone C++ Coder's Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
lonecppcoder.com
The Lone C++ Coder's Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
angelleleger.net
Angelle Leger - Angelle Leger
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
brunorb.com
Structure and Interpretation of Bruno's Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
juliano-alves.com
Juliano Alves
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bugarin.dev
bugarin
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lonfarr.com
Lon Farr's Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
pembrokesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Pembroke Software
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
mouseforge.com
MouseForge – A programmer's diary
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alex-abraham.dev
Alex Abraham | Software Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.