Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to reed-decker.com

Portfolio | Reed Decker, PhD · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
julialongenecker.com
Julia Longenecker, PhD, LP
1 shared topicsmental-health
68match
astridnoya.com
Astrid Noya - Portfolio
1 shared topicsmental-health
68match
buildwithanna.dev
Anna's Portfolio
1 shared topicsmental-health
67match
bryanbarks.com
Portfolio - Bryan Barks, LLC
1 shared topicsmental-health
67match
audreymaxi.com
Graduate Portfolio | Audrey Maximillian Herli
1 shared topicsmental-health
66match
bryap.com
Brya K. Patterson Portfolio
1 shared topicsmental-health
65match
mtturnock.com
MARY THOMAS-TURNOCK, PHD
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
alexandrakellyphd.com
Alexandra Kelly, PhD
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
judyisaac.com
Home - Judy Isaac, PhD
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
andrewtuckerphd.com
Home - Andrew Tucker PhD
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
annchanlerphd.com
Ann Chanler, Ph.D. - Clinical Psychologist and Psychoanalyst
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
louiseellis.com
BASES Sport and Exercise Scientist - psychology
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
annbblakephd.com
Ann B. Blake, PhD
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
annamcquinnphd.com
Anna McQuinn, PhD
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
acesopsychology.com
Aceso Psychology Canberra | Evidence-Based Therapy & Performance Support
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
alexpalmerphd.com
Alex Palmer, Ph.D.
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
echoesoffthe5.com
Echoes Off The 5
1 shared topicsmental-health
64match
eddietaylorphd.com
Eddie Taylor, PhD, pllc, Psychologist, Chicago, IL
1 shared topicsmental-health

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.