Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to reducta.de

Reducta GmbH · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
plusplan-gmbh.de 🇩🇪
plusplan GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
pfe-penke.de 🇩🇪
Start - PFE GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
philippi-bau.com
Philippi Bau GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
philippibau.com
Philippi Bau GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
probautec.de 🇩🇪
pro-bau-tec GmbH |
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
gremi-gmbh.com
Gremi GmbH & Co. KG
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
gremigmbh.com
Gremi GmbH & Co. KG
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
innophalt.com
Innobit GmbH - Home
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
pib-technology.de 🇩🇪
PIB Technology GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
rbb-consulting.de 🇩🇪
RBB Consulting GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
projektbau-ruhr.de 🇩🇪
Projektbau Ruhr GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
pipefocus.de 🇩🇪
PIPEFOCUS BEZELA GMBH - Willkommen!
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
64match
quada-consulting.de 🇩🇪
QUADA Consulting GmbH
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry
64match
reko-tech.de 🇩🇪
Home - REKO-TECH GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
schilles-tiefbau.de 🇩🇪
Schilles Tiefbau GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
64match
rapidrohr.de 🇩🇪
RAPID Rohrtechnik GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
63match
green-asset.com
Home | Green Asset GmbH
2 shared topicsconstruction-industry
63match
pichleringenieure.com
PICHLER Ingenieure GmbH
2 shared topicscivil-engineering-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.