Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to redekopp.dev

James Redekopp · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
gabisonia.dev
Irakli Gabisonia | Notes on software architecture, engineering leadership, and building reliable systems.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
efebolukbasi.com
Efe Bolukbasi | CS @ QueensU
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
bzhou.dev
Brandon Zhou
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simobj.com
cs rediscovery
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alexportland.com
Home | Alex Portland
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
gameswithcode.com
Games with Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lucaspunz.com
Lucas Punz
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
mousakhaled.com
Khaled Mousa — Engineer & Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abutini.com
Kefa Kassahun — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
anitalakhadze.dev
Ani Talakhadze
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
jsnhe.com
Jason He
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simonwu.dev
Less Travelled
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
justindaludado.com
Justin Daludado | Computer Science Student Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
galiarmero.dev
Gali Armero · Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
justyouraveragecoder.com
Just Your Average Coder
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
kaanpeksen.com
Kaan P. | Computer Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
multitasq.com
Justin McCandless · Justin McCandless
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
alexquinn.org
Alex Quinn - home page
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.