Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to quickdata.de

QUICKDATA Plant Solution by EVIAS · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
62match
software-maker.net
Data Analytics
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
opendatazensus.de 🇩🇪
Open Data Zensus
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
opendata-duisburg.de 🇩🇪
Open Data Duisburg
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
krake.dev
Open Data Aggregator
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
offenedatenduesseldorf.de 🇩🇪
Open Data Düsseldorf
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
opensanctions.de 🇩🇪
OpenSanctions: Supreme Data on Supreme Leaders
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
pool-media-muc.de 🇩🇪
THW-Pegel - Opendata API
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
fankunde.com
The Data Architects - Data & Insights » tractionwise
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
open-data-kommunal.de 🇩🇪
Kommunaler Fahrplan Open Data
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
politischeoekonomie.de 🇩🇪
Talk Data To Me / Sven Jarmer
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
politischeoekonomik.de 🇩🇪
Talk Data To Me / Sven Jarmer
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
openvrs.de 🇩🇪
Open Data Service : VRS Website
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
offenes-aachen.de 🇩🇪
Open Data Lab Aachen – Offene Daten für Aachen
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
opendataranking.de 🇩🇪
Open Data in Deutschland – Das Open Data Ranking
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
pc-database.de 🇩🇪
PC-Database
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
powerdatadynamics.de 🇩🇪
PowerData Dynamics - DATENANALYSE | DATA ANALYSIS
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
projekt-difa.de 🇩🇪
Projekt DIfA – Data Intelligence for Audit
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
abkuerzung.org
Abkuerzung.org - Abkürzungen finden - Definition und Glossar
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.