Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to quantow.com

Quantow – Design Research Develop · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
petrostsoukalas.com
PETROS TSOUKALAS ARCHITECT – PTA Design Research Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
azeemhamid.com
azeemhamid.com – Azeem Hamid, design research portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
newlandh2o.com
Newland H2O – Research and Development in water conscious-design
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
sanyuktamathure.com
Sanyukta Mathure: Design Research and Foresight
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
saralianpe.com
Sara Pe – Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
azaltura.com
Ariel Altura – design
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
rpattersoncreates.com
Ryan Patterson – designs
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
erinwaughtal.com
Erin Waughtal – Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
aestavisuals.com
Aesta Visuals – Design + Render
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
afalaludesigns.com
Afalalu Muhammadu – Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
afalalu.com
Afalalu Muhammadu – Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
samuliheikkinen.com
Samuli Heikkinen – Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
giuliadettole.com
Giulia D' Ettole – Design & Research
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
bysoothing.com
design by soothing – Design by Soothing
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
pirjohaikola.com
home – designer, researcher, educator
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
gigipolo.com
Gigi Polo – Design, research, pedagogy, and film in integrated practice
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
nickshoemaker.com
Nick Shoemaker – Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
karintehve.com
karin tehve/ work – research education projects
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.