similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to quantlib.org

Quantlib alternatives & similar sites

QuantLib, a free/open-source library for quantitative finance — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
keeforge.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	KeeForge — Free, Open-Source KeePass for iOS	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keeforge.app ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	KeeForge — Free, Open-Source KeePass for iOS	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
gtk.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The GTK Project - A free and open-source cross-platform widget toolkit	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hekate.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hekate.io : Java Library for Distributed Services	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
data-explorer.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Data Explorer - Open-Source Interactive Data Visualization Tool	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
remanager.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	reManager - The open-source mod manager for reMarkable	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
data-tl.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Data Technology Lab \| Quantitative Trading Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csharpmarc.app ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	C# MARC Editor – The FREE, full-featured, open source editor for Library of Congress MARC21 and MARCXML bibliography records	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csharpmarc.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	C# MARC Editor – The FREE, full-featured, open source editor for Library of Congress MARC21 and MARCXML bibliography records	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buenagames.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Buena Labs — Apps, typefaces, and open-source tools for writers and developers.	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buenalabs.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Buena Labs — Apps, typefaces, and open-source tools for writers and developers.	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
affine.pro ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AFFiNE — Open-Source Knowledge Base Software	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elabftw.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	eLabFTW - free open source ELN	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apiberg.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Apiberg: Open-Source API Client	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fairform.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Fairform – Free & Open Source Form Builder \| Typeform Alternative	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csvwriter.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CsvWriter Alternatives for C# Excel Library \| IronXL	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotcommoners.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	dotcommoners — Open-source infrastructure for the commons	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bareos.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Bareos — Open-Source Enterprise Backup Software	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.