similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to prudentsec.com

Prudentsec alternatives & similar sites

PrudentSec - Penetration Testing Services — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
2hack.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	2hack - Penetration Testing as a Service	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
invadel.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity & Penetration Testing Services \| Invadel	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
netragard.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Netragard - Penetration Testing Company	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
netragard.io ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Netragard - Penetration Testing Company	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
netraguard.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Netragard - Penetration Testing Company	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
vrcybersec.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	VRCyberSec \| Penetration Testing	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
needsec.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	NeedSec \| UK Penetration Testing & Cyber Security Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
skulkr.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Skulkr — Elite Penetration Testing	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
dotechosecure.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Echo Secure - Penetration Testing and Phishing Simulations	en	information-and-network-security HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
protocol4.io ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Protocol4 — Penetration Testing for Dental Practices	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
provecore.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Provecore — Penetration Testing for B2B SaaS	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ctxzero.dev ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	ctxzero — Penetration Tester	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vortexshieldlabs.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Penetration Testing for Web, API, Cloud, and AI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
nehilo.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Website Security Audits & Penetration Testing \| NEHILO	en	information-and-network-security WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cyberaudit.eu ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Penetration Testing Europe \| Penetration Testing Europe	European Union en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vpentest.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Automated Network Penetration Testing \| Vonahi Security	en	information-and-network-security Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doraaudit.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Securitum. Leading european penetration testing company	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
negrinisecurity.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Negrini Security \| Red Team and Penetration Testing.	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.