Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to proplanta.de

Informationszentrum für die Landwirtschaft | proplanta.de · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
82match
proplanta.at 🇦🇹
Informationszentrum für die Landwirtschaft | proplanta.de
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
82match
proplanta.ch 🇨🇭
Informationszentrum für die Landwirtschaft | proplanta.de
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
37match
dlg-mitteilungen.de 🇩🇪
DLG-Mitteilungen - Zukunft Landwirtschaft - DLG Mitteilungen
4 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
35match
almorsico.com
NABIL MORSI CO.
3 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
35match
agrarsoftware.ch 🇨🇭
Isagri Schweiz Agrarsoftware - Isagri Agrarsoftware für Landwirtschaft in der Schweiz - Schlagkartei, Herdenmanagement & mehr
3 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
34match
ekotechnika.de 🇩🇪
Ekotechnika | Moderne Technik für eine effiziente Landwirtschaft
3 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
34match
farminova.de 🇩🇪
FARMINOVA Plant Factory
3 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
34match
farmsight.de 🇩🇪
Start - Porst Landtechnik GmbH
3 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
33match
100landtechnik.ch 🇨🇭
100% Landtechnik | Die landwirtschaftliche Gratis-Zeitung
3 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
33match
kassapreise.com
Kassapreise - Preisinformationen für Futtermittel und Getreide
3 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
33match
fssolutions.ch 🇨🇭
Landmaschinen, Landwirtschaftsmaschinen | Schötz, Dagmersellen, Willisau | F&S Solutions GmbH
3 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture
33match
dlg-test.de 🇩🇪
Prüfberichte
3 shared tech1 shared categoryagriculture

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.