Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to property-soft.de

Property-Soft GmbH · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
smallsoft.de 🇩🇪
smallSoft GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
prohka.de 🇩🇪
PROHKA | SK-Soft GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
theasoft.de 🇩🇪
DE - theasoft GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
sicherheitsdatenblatt-software.de 🇩🇪
GeSi-Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
softwarekstatt.de 🇩🇪
softwarekstatt GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
smartreco.com
RecoScript GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
q5software.de 🇩🇪
Q5 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
q5-software.de 🇩🇪
Q5 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
redislan.de 🇩🇪
Werstein IT GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
redoks.de 🇩🇪
Werstein IT GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
t1-software.de 🇩🇪
T1 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
smartsoftlab.de 🇩🇪
SmartSoftLab GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
kpro-software.com
KPro Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
sole-software.de 🇩🇪
SOLE Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
softwarewerke.de 🇩🇪
Softwarewerke GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
solesoftware.de 🇩🇪
SOLE Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
software-werke.de 🇩🇪
Softwarewerke GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
anima.software
Anima Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.