Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to prolorem.com

Home | Prolorem Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
piqueraypublishing.com
Home | Piqueray Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
dissonancerising.com
HOME | Cratefires Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
thelanepublishing.com
The Lane Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
bluegatepublishing.com
Home | Blue Gate Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
bogartno5.com
Bogart No.5 Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
picbookspub.com
PicBooks Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
intriguepublishing.com
Home - Intrigue Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
alexparkerpublishing.com
Alex Parker Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
fantasticalrealm.com
Home - Fantastical Realm Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
bellstreetpublishing.com
Bell Street Publishing - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
distemper-memoir.com
Colonus Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ambercovepublishing.com
Amber Cove Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
greenvasepublishing.com
Green Vase Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
blueboxaudiovisual.com
Bluebox and January Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
thesloppyokapi.com
Yellow Light Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
1kfaces.com
Thousand Faces Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
4oakbooks.com
4 Oak Books – Independent Publisher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
pointofimpactbooks.com
Point of Impact Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.