Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to project-gutenberg.de

Home - Projekt Gutenberg · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
probibi.de 🇩🇪
Home - probibi
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
projekt-vielseitig.de 🇩🇪
- Projekt VielSeitig
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
paco-bay.de 🇩🇪
Home - Paco Bay
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
olivereck.de 🇩🇪
- Home - Impressum
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
piggybooks.de 🇩🇪
Home - Piggybooks
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
protemion.de 🇩🇪
Protemion Projekt
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
neva-verlag.com
Home - Neva Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
agnesgerstenberg.com
Agnes Gerstenberg
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
persoenlichebuecher.com
Home - Persönliche Bücher
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
rockyalife.com
Home - Isabell Hahn
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
rockyasoul.com
Home - Isabell Hahn
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
anneweiss.net
Home - Anne Weiss
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
ares-verlag.com
Home - Ares Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
projekt-cassandra.de 🇩🇪
Projekt Cassandra – Literatur als Frühwarnsystem
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
bibliopolium.net
Home - Bibliopolium
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
profisellerdiebjeck.de 🇩🇪
Home - E-Book-Wunder
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
one-vision-ahead.de 🇩🇪
Home - TOEPPERVISIONEN.COM
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
ringwall.de 🇩🇪
Home - Der Neue Jörg
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.