Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to programsourcecode.com

Program Sourcecode · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
nvup.com
Nv Up
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
obgo.com
Ob Go
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
rocksolidops.com
Programblings
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
rumorsource.com
Rumorsource
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
2bitprogrammers.com
2-Bit Programmers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
resourcesinformation.com
Resources Information
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
itsopensource.com
itsopensource
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
pleasantprogrammer.com
Pleasant Programmer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
maegic.dev
MAEGIC Development Program
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
angelbanks.com
Angel Banks · Senior Program Manager
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
compass-sys.com
Home - Compass Systems and Programming
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
mojavelinux.com
Open Source Advocacy | mojavelinux.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
makeopensource.com
MakeOpenSource
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
morseresource.com
Morse Resource
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
monedula.dev
Monedula — Writing & open source
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
resourcefulbees.com
Team Resourceful
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
rrwebcloud.com
rrweb - #1 Open Source Session Replay
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
rrweb.com
rrweb - #1 Open Source Session Replay
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.