Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to profilverlag.de

Home: Profil Verlag · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
schubert-kahl.de 🇩🇪
Kahl Verlag: Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
prego-cookbookstore.de 🇩🇪
ZS Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ares-verlag.com
Home - Ares Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
neva-verlag.com
Home - Neva Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
siebertverlag.de 🇩🇪
SIEBERT VERLAG
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
a-verlag.com
A-Verlag - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
artesinex.com
artesinex verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
plusknauss-verlag.de 🇩🇪
+KNAUSS Verlag – Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
sieveking-verlag.de 🇩🇪
Sieveking Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
sieveking-publishing.de 🇩🇪
Sieveking Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
schilling-verlag.de 🇩🇪
Schilling | Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
proiecta-verlag.de 🇩🇪
proiecta Verlag: Start
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
schnell-und-steiner.de 🇩🇪
Home - Verlag Schnell & Steiner
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
ritterbooks.com
Ritterverlag |
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
grosswiele.com
Therese Grosswiele Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
reinhardt-medien.de 🇩🇪
Friedrich Reinhardt Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
orient-und-okzident.de 🇩🇪
Der Verlag Orient & Okzident
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
kritzelkoenig.com
Der Kritzelkönig Verlag - Walter Hanel
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.