Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to pro-found.de

Startseite - Pro Found · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
93match
profound.ch 🇨🇭
Startseite - Pro Found
4 co-citations14 shared tech1 shared categoryretirement-planning
36match
aap-advisory.com
aap advisory – ASSET AND PENSION ADVISORY
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryfinancial-planning
36match
altersvorsorge-ausland.de 🇩🇪
Karriere im Ausland und sichere Altersvorsorge in Deutschland?
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryretirement-planning
33match
exper-pro.de 🇩🇪
Exper-Pro - Beratung für Betriebliche u. Private Altersvorsorge in München
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryretirement-planning
33match
firmenrisiken.com
Suretec - einfach gut beraten
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryretirement-planning
33match
altersvorsorgesoftware.de 🇩🇪
Suretec - einfach gut beraten
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryretirement-planning
32match
provisa.ch 🇨🇭
Home - PROVISA AG
1 co-citations1 shared categoryretirement-planning
30match
chromatic-gear.com
Chromatik Rentenberatung International – Startseite
1 co-citations1 shared categoryretirement-planning
29match
akademiker-vorsorge.at 🇦🇹
Daheim Bleibt Daheim
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryretirement-planning
29match
vorsorge50plus.at 🇦🇹
Daheim Bleibt Daheim
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryretirement-planning
29match
gg-profis.de 🇩🇪
Grenzgänger Profis | Versicherung & Vorsorge für Grenzgänger Schweiz
5 shared tech1 shared categoryretirement-planning
29match
profond.ch 🇨🇭
Berufliche Vorsorge mit überdurchschnittlichen Leistungen | Profond
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryretirement-planning

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.