Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ppierson.com

Patrick Pierson · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
adoy.net
Consultant Adoy inc. - Pierrick Charron
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
donniegroves.com
Donnie Groves' Personal Page
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
boxmetrics.io
boxmetrics
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
donikachristova.com
Donika - My Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
matrixsols.com
Matrixsols
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
robertpamfile.com
Pamfile Robert | Personal page
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
sophiaphu.com
Sophia's Personal Website
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
gregharker.com
Greg Harker's Personal Web Page
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
advaitnair.org
Advait Nair - Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
kyleblazier.com
Kyle Blazier
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
billmerickel.com
Bill Merickel
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
boxemenoch.com
Boxem Metrics
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
domesposito.com
Dom Esposito — Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
dominikbrandon.com
Dominik B. Grzelak's personal page
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
investimetric.io
Investimetric
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
isaiash.com
Isaias Huerta - Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
ishaingersol.com
Isha Ingersol
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
mashiruwu.com
Diego Henrick
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.