Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to polymill.com

Polymill · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
sargeit.com
SargeIT · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
83match
iandy.dev
iAndy88 · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
epyzo.com
EPYZO · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
82match
nthippe.com
xanthippe · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
gisminder.com
gisminder · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
82match
erthenvar.com
erthenvar · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
gizemasan.com
gizemasann · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
81match
runnerable.com
runnerable · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
epsilongruis.com
epsilongruis · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
ohyeahpb.com
matthewdurham · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
kartiba.com
Kartiba · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
byteflamesoftware.com
mrpowe07 (Matt Powers) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
sophiahorizon.com
SophiaHorizon · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
ryugujo.dev
RyugujoDev (Ryūgūjō Dev) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
olikode.com
olikode (Oliver T. Kolltveit) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
ervacon.com
Ervacon · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
samtayl.com
samtayl · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
notevil.dev
NotEvil · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.