Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pointsofi.com

points of i · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
pointcast.io
Pointcast
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
pointhalo.com
PointHalo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
garylapointe.com
Gary LaPointe
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
oceansofcode.com
Oceans of Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
sharepointchick.com
Mirjam's thoughts on SharePoint
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
sharonpoint.com
Home - SharonPoint
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
sharonpoint365.com
Home - SharonPoint
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
sharepointyankee.com
SharePoint Yankee
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
anendpointguy.com
An Endpoint Guy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
sharepointshowboat.com
The SharePoint Showboat
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
100storypoints.com
100 Story Points – That's all you get
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
sharepoint-mentor.com
SharePoint Mentor
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewsiemen.com
Ramblings of a Nimrod
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
sharingsharepoint.com
Sharing SharePoint
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
100daysofhomelab.com
100 Days of HomeLab
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anhourofinnovation.com
An Hour of Innovation Podcast
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
plusiv.dev
Portfolio of Jorge Massih
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ethquest.io
EthQuest - Adventure of A Lifetime
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.