Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to plannedsoft.com

Planned Soft · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
plannedproject.com
PlannedProject
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
bayinfosystems.com
Bad Software
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
rigid-soft.com
Home - Rigid Soft
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
rewiredsoftware.com
Rewired Software – A blog.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anandarony.com
Rony Barua - Experienced Software QA Lead
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
itsoftwaretips.com
It Software Tips!
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
disciplinedsystems.com
Disciplined Systems
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
getupandlearn.com
- Technical and Soft skill blogs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
100topsoftware.com
100 Top Software Sites
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
100topsoftwaresites.com
100 Top Software Sites
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
exinsoft.com
ExinSoft
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
geekdojo.com
geekdojo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
planetdz.com
planetdz
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
investigatingsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Investigating Software
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
evancaplan.dev
Evan Caplan | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
cedarsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Homepage - Cedar Software
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gennarobaratta.com
Gennaro Baratta | Backend Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
here2theresoftware.com
Home | Here2There Software
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.