Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to plan-form.at

Plan Form Plus – Design für Menschen · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
undform.de 🇩🇪
&form – Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
loudstudio.at 🇦🇹
LoudStudio – Design & Art
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
ocean-cad.com
oceAn-CAD – design solutions
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
andreapfleger.com
andrea pfleger – design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
studiolia.at 🇦🇹
STUDIO LIA – design + architecture
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
mediarte.at 🇦🇹
mediarte – designing your imagination
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
annettehinterwirth.com
Annette Hinterwirth – Design & Product Design
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
iusii.com
seidldesign – Brand Design Agency
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
und-co.at 🇦🇹
&Co – graphicdesign | Graz
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
heikowolthaus.com
Wolthaus Mid Century Design – WMCD
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
helenareinsch.com
Helena Reinsch – Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
eicloud.at 🇦🇹
eicloud.at – Logo Design Illustration
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
superhappymarket.com
Super Happy Market – Designmarkt in Düsseldorf
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
design-und-text.at 🇦🇹
Design und Text – Sanja und Sonja
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
derpixelgarten.at 🇦🇹
derpixelgarten – Graphic Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
modelhart.at 🇦🇹
Modelhart Design – Visuelle Kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
annajeske.com
Anna Jeske – Communication Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
thegoodcreative.de 🇩🇪
The Good Creative – Ganzheitliches & Individuelles Design für persönliche Marken
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.