Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pkepps.com

Peter Keppeler · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
calabrese.dev
Peter Calabrese
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
poitor.dev
Peter - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
caleblee.dev
Backend Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
oegoroov.com
Oleg Egorov — Systems Architecture
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
heterl0.com
Heterl0
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
henryihenacho.com
Henry Ihenacho
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
iskandar.dev
Peter Iskandar - iskandar.dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
maciesowicz.com
Matthew Maciesowicz | Computer Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
anilozmen.com
Anıl Özmen - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewzappella.com
Andrew Zappella
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
antonchesnokov.com
Anton Chesnokov | CTO / Backend Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
moreiradev.com
Sergio Moreira | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
moreira.dev
Sergio Moreira | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mohammadi.dev
Sina Mohammadi | Computer Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
shaunreed.com
Shaun Reed
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
anesucain.com
Anesu Mugomba | Full-Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
helloiambryce.com
Bryce Jackson — Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
madhusgowda.com
Madhu S Gowda | Senior Web3 Backend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.