Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to pixcoders.com

Rafal Spacjer blog · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
rafaelnaufal.com
Rafael Naufal’s blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
pitayan.com
Pitayan Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
andremello.dev
André Mello Dev Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
sapehin.com
Blog - Pavel Sapehin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
pinecoder.dev
Pinecoder blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
bernheisel.com
Blog · Bernheisel
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
gerbenvanadrichem.com
Gerben's blog | Musings on software development and quality assurance
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
rafaelbiriba.com
Latest Posts – Rafael Biriba Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
readeveloper.com
Readeveloper
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
ragecode.com
Rage Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
huwyss.com
Hans Ulrich Wyss - Professional Software Development and Continuous Learning
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
ianoxley.com
Ian Oxley | Notes on software development and other miscellany.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
samclane.dev
Sawyer McLane – Python, Embedded Software, and Game Development
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
rafaelquintanilha.com
Rafael Quintanilha
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
oshinyil.com
Oshinyil Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
samuelolaegbe.com
Samuel Olaegbe | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
nurdli.com
Jesse Johnson
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
pzuraq.com
pzuraq | blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.