Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pittenauer.com

Martin Pittenauer | Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
kumarashish.com
Ashish Kumar | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
arnav-sethi.com
Arnav Sethi | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
fbence.com
Bence Farkas | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
alexmccairel.dev
Alex McCairel | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
theshaunwilson.com
Shaun Wilson | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mclaindevelopment.com
Ross McLain | Portfolio v2
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
nibardo.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ionnegru.com
Ion Negru | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
rkdebugs.com
Ravikiran | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mattsibson.com
Matt Sibson - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
robertpopeii.com
Robert Pope II | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
abosh.me
Andrew Abosh — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
arogyadhakal.com
Arogya Dhakal | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
abhixv.dev
Abhishek Sharma | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
adrian-develops.net
Adrian Papania | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
krisjulio.dev
Kris - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
piersrajguru.com
Piers Rajguru - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
aldodev.org
Aldo Lucchetta - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.