Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pitcher4senate.com

Matthew Pitcher for ASUC Senate* · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
matthewpitaro.com
Matthew Pitaro -- Home
2 shared topicselections
69match
matthews4ohiosenate.com
Linda Matthews for Ohio Senate | Together. Ohio Can.
2 shared topicselections
69match
boettgerformnsenate.com
Andrea Boettger for MN Senate
2 shared topicselections
68match
gregoryeichelberger.com
Gregory Eichelberger for U.S. Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
68match
kunce-mo.com
Lucas Kunce for U.S. Senate
2 shared topicselections
68match
andybarrforcongress.com
Andy Barr for Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
68match
andybarrforky.com
Andy Barr for Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
68match
mattformagistrate.com
Matthew Kline for Magistrate
2 shared topicspolitics
67match
rolandfortexas.com
Vote Roland Gutierrez for US Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
67match
alani4senate.net
Alani Bankhead for U.S. Senate · Montana
2 shared topicselections
67match
alani4mt.net
Alani Bankhead for U.S. Senate · Montana
2 shared topicselections
67match
alani2026.com
Alani Bankhead for U.S. Senate · Montana
2 shared topicselections
67match
alanibankhead4montana.net
Alani Bankhead for U.S. Senate · Montana
2 shared topicselections
67match
alanibankheadformontana.net
Alani Bankhead for U.S. Senate · Montana
2 shared topicselections
67match
alanibankheadforsenate.net
Alani Bankhead for U.S. Senate · Montana
2 shared topicselections
67match
alaniformt.net
Alani Bankhead for U.S. Senate · Montana
2 shared topicselections
67match
alaniforsenate.net
Alani Bankhead for U.S. Senate · Montana
2 shared topicselections
67match
alaniformontana.net
Alani Bankhead for U.S. Senate · Montana
2 shared topicselections

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.