similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to pitagora-network.org

Pitagora Network | pitagora-network.github.io · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

iPPLab · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

iPPLab · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

agileos · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

belcapp · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

Invaryon · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

kuroskin (Konstantin Uroskin) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

akshchand (Aksh) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

phonetworks.com

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

TheSamyar (Samyar_dsi) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andrewhall (Andrew Hall) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

armedcodes · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

beepboop.digital

Beep Boop Digital · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

Highlighted Projects | gruelbox.github.io

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

insoman1ac (Anton Gorodchanin) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

AngrryLab™ Network

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

binarystudios.net

Binarystudios Network | We do things so you don't have to

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Inueni · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.