Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pirojoc.dev

Victor Pirojoc · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
fariasjones.com
Marc Farias Jones
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
masonmaeder.com
Mason Maeder
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
roohutton.com
roo hutton
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kristijan-federer.com
Kristijan Federer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
robeden.com
Rob Eden
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
24setup.com
24Setup | Home
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andrewnt.dev
Andrew Nguyen - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
bnjfolio.dev
Benjie Ben Garcia | Archive
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
fedory.com
Hi there, I’m Paul!Product Eng & Developer. - Paul Fedory
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
mattpryer.com
Matt Pryer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
albertovilches.dev
Alberto Vilches
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
aa11.dev
Adrian Acosta
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewbeaver.dev
Andrew Beaver | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
annawallstrom.com
Anna Wallström - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
maxbibikov.com
Max Bibikov - full stack software developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
rodwoodman.com
rodwoodman.com - personal website for Rod Woodman, a Bay Area software developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
a7mdd.dev
Ahmed Almerri — Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
abbouddavid.com
David Abboud
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.