Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to pineger.com

Steve Pineger, Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
ahmednagy.com
Ahmed Nagy | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
numanarif.dev
Arif - Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
sameterap.com
MSc Software Engineer, Samet ERAP
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
royliustudio.com
ROY.DEV | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
aganaki.com
Aganaki — Software Engineering
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
samcarty.com
Sam Carty | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
aag-software.com
AAG Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
chaitanyap.com
Chait Pinn - Software engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
alechsu.com
AlecHsu - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
icyvance.com
Isaac Vance | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
husamdahliz.com
Husam Dahliz - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
errolkeith.com
Errol Keith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
azatvaliev.com
Azat Valiev - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
rupadhillon.com
Rupa Dhillon: Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
eseosa.com
Eseosa — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
bernardbarnieh.com
Bernard Barnieh — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
avessoftware.com
Aves Software
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
medeni.dev
Mustafa MEDENi — Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.