Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pimia.dev

Lauri Pimiä · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
rjvelazco.com
Rafael Velazco
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
ahvenniemi.info
Sami Ahvenniemi — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrezorn.dev
Andre Zorn
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
gtusime.com
Godwin | Java Full Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
adev.me
ash · software engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
mattmik.com
Matthew Mikolay
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
robertbalazsi.com
Robert Balazsi | Java developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
alexischavez.io
Alexis Chávez - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
dkobzar.com
Daniil Kobzar - Java Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
armaizadenwala.com
Software Engineer Portfolio - JS, Python, Ruby | Armaiz
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
1benw.com
Ben Walker - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mateocela.com
Mateo Çela | Full Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
matiullah.dev
Matiullah Karimi | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bobowski.dev
Adam Bobowski
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
kylecode.com
Kyle Norris
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
kylenorris.com
Kyle Norris
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ahmadrizal1st.com
Ahmad Rizal Full-Stack Software Engineer | React, Go, TypeScript
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
belokon.net
Alexander Belokon
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.