Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pimhakkert.com

pimhakkert (Pim Hakkert) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
mattchard.com
mchar7 (Matt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
meckbaig.dev
meckbaig · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewlmartin.dev
AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
asm.im
Soulghost (Sou1gh0st) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
nflverse.com
nflverse · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
benedikt-lohse.dev
LinuxTux23 (bl) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
robertsenseman.com
rsenseman (Rob) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alchemyst.dev
Alchemyst0x (Alchemyst) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
dita-users.com
DITA Users · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
adsenseexperts.org
hparadiz (Henry Paradiz) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
afqx.net
ArcticFqx (Dan-Eric Næss) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
clineventures.com
tom-cline (Tom Cline) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
robertpaul.io
robertwpaul (Robert Paul) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
benjaminkott.com
benjaminkott (Benjamin Kott) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
sottey.com
sottey (Sean Ottey) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
arjen.dev
arjenbos (Arjen Bos) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
aaronbassett.com
aaronbassett (Aaron Bassett) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
nexusgo.app
tkdeng (TKD Engineer) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.