Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pierreburel.com

Pierre Burel – Web developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
shokati.com
web developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
ethanclevenger.com
Ethan Clevenger – Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
74match
eternaldeveloper.com
Eternal Web Developers
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
reshubhatt.com
Reshu | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
calcalajatan.com
Cal — Web Developer & Designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
riajul.com
Riajul – Designer & Web Developer | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
73match
connerking.com
Conner King - Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
andyknapp.com
Andy Knapp | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
macosta.dev
Macosta - Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
aniwebr.com
Anish | Creative Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
73match
shanejeremich.com
Shane Jeremich | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
m-web.dev
Muaaz Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
shinedaschacko.com
Shine Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
andreibel.com
Andrei Bel - Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
aneesajansher.com
ANEESA WEB DEVELOPER
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
shedside.com
Article Seven – web design and development
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
andrewrapier.com
Andrew Rapier — Web Developer & Designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
camdrit.io
Cam Richardson - Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.