Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pianta.io

About Pianta · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
sonerguler.com
About
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
inxware.io
About - inxware
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
rokatzo.com
Rokatzo
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
neuve.ai
Neuve | A new way to think about reviews
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
benjaminmckinley.com
Benjamin McKinley
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
intertects.com
Intertects - Software Engineering
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
rnjohn.com
John Fontalvo | About me
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
mattglick.com
Matt Glick – Leader of Engineering Teams
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
aboutfoss.org
aboutfoss(dot)org
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
artofsoftwareengineering.com
ART of SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
mattlaroche.com
Matt Laroche – Software Engineering Manager
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
distributedpassions.com
Distributed Systems and Software Engineering - Blogging about distributed systems
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
thesoftwareengineeringfiles.com
The Software Engineering Files
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
arqitec.io
Arqitec - Architecture Led Delivery
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
clifmo.com
Clifton Molina
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
rocket-propulsion.com
RP Software+Engineering UG
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
robertjanicki.com
Robert Janicki
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
adamdabrowski.dev
Adam Dąbrowski - Software Consultant
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.