Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to phivk.com

Philo van Kemenade · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
60match
amin3d.com
Amin Kamal – Realistische visuals met technische basis
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
illumiware.com
Home
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
thalissaugc.com
Beige Neutral UGC Creator Portfolio Presentation
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
aaninhetdonker.nl 🇳🇱
Maak je eigen AAN in het donker poster
2 shared topicsdigital-arts
60match
bartsleddens.nl 🇳🇱
Bart Sleddens' Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
codedmatters.nl 🇳🇱
Coded Matter(s) - Explorations in hybrid art, design and music
2 shared topicsdesign
33match
nandavandenhoek.com
Nanda van den Hoek
1 shared topicsdesign
33match
patricevandijk.com
Art | Patrice van Dijk
1 shared topicsdesign
33match
designerhanna.com
Designer Hanna van Ingen
1 shared topicsdesign
32match
paulvanboven.com
paul van boven communications
1 shared topicsdesign
32match
consultantdesign.nl 🇳🇱
Consultant Design Van Prooijen
1 shared topicsdesign
32match
biondavandenouden.nl 🇳🇱
Bionda van den Ouden – Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
32match
tessavanopzeeland.com
Tessa van Opzeeland – Graphic Design
1 shared topicsdesign
32match
bouwschadehuis.nl 🇳🇱
Bondt en Blue, van concept tot realisatie
1 shared topicsdesign
32match
creativeproductideas.nl 🇳🇱
creative product ideas by joost van Rooij
1 shared topicsdesign
32match
bakeliet.net
Bakeliet, het materiaal van 1001 toepassingen
1 shared topicsdesign
31match
aldovandennieuwelaar.nl 🇳🇱
Aldo van Den Nieuwelaar-Design (@aldovandennieuwelaardesigns) • Instagram photos and videos
1 shared topicsdesign
31match
angelineau.nl 🇳🇱
Studio Angelineau - wij geven vorm aan de wereld van morgen
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.