Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to philomelbook.com

Philomel - Penguin Books · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
nalromance.com
Berkley - Penguin Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
78match
nalbooks.com
Berkley - Penguin Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
78match
nalbook.com
Berkley - Penguin Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
78match
nalauthors.com
Berkley - Penguin Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
4colorbooks.com
4 Color Books - Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
rhwritersacademy.com
Penguin Books UK | Official Website
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
pbaqrcode.com
Matthew Desmond Books - Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
angelsgame.net
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
anne-iversaryofgreengables.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
8thcontinentbooks.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
abookofspiritsandthieves.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
agreatandterriblebeauty.net
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
averybook.biz
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
averybooks.biz
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
averyexperts.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
babynamelab.org
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
babynamelab.net
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
badgirlsofthebible.org
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.