Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to philippegallo.com

Philippe Gallo – Céramiste · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
marlenerequier.com
Marlène Requier – Céramiques
1 shared topicsfine-art
70match
branchard-daniel.com
Branchard Daniel – Artiste Céramiste
1 shared topicsfine-art
68match
arielledegasquet.com
Arielle de Gasquet | Céramiste
1 shared topicsfine-art
68match
do-nogues.com
Atelier Do Noguès – Céramique d’art et dessins
1 shared topicsfine-art
68match
atelier-donogues.fr 🇫🇷
Atelier Do Noguès – Céramique d’art et dessins
1 shared topicsfine-art
67match
atelierdesbrosses.fr 🇫🇷
Atelier DESBROSSES – l'atelier de Céramique
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
perrinegicquel.com
Perrine Gicquel – artiste céramiste à Rochefort sur Loire, Maine-et-Loire
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
atelierlux.fr 🇫🇷
Lux – Art Works
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
mathieusegret.com
Mathieu Segret – Artiste
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
dablemont.fr 🇫🇷
sculptures – des
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
danydufour.fr 🇫🇷
Dany Dufour | Céramiste sculpteur | France
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
francoise-vantaux.fr 🇫🇷
Françoise Vantaux – Artiste
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
marjolainedegremont.com
Marjolaine Degremont – Artiste
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
6neweb.fr 🇫🇷
6neweb – le coin des artistes
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
emmanuelle-guilbot.fr 🇫🇷
Emmanuelle Guilbot | Céramiste plasticienne
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
kristinetsala.com
Kristine – Artiste contemporain
1 shared topicsfine-art
66match
martinieri.com
Martinieri – Artiste plasticien
1 shared topicsfine-art
65match
ep-art-therapie.fr 🇫🇷
Art Thérapie – Emmanuelle Petit
1 shared topicsfine-art

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.