Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to peterrooth.com

Peter Rooth – peter@rooth.tech · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
61match
alltkul.se 🇸🇪
Esbjörn Grip
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
60match
acczo.net
Acczo - webbyrå för smarta digitala lösningar
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
acczo.org
Acczo - webbyrå för smarta digitala lösningar
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
bergshireinc.com
Bergshire Inc - Welcome
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
dinwebbpartner.com
Din Webbpartner — Moderna hemsidor som säljer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
60match
fagelsta.com
Ylva Marie Brunnberg — Senior konsult
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
fankhausergroup.com
Fankhauser Group
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
60match
kontaktcodeview.com
Codeview - Din digitala partner
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
60match
netify24.com
Net24
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
60match
smpsol.com
Professionell Webbyrå i Stockholm | Skräddarsydda webblösningar | SMP Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
snabbsida.com
Snabbsida
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
60match
aidtech.se 🇸🇪
Hem
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
agodata.se 🇸🇪
Detta är en test av min hemsida
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
allatimmar.se 🇸🇪
Perryson Forwarding
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
60match
allguna.se 🇸🇪
Webbyrå i Helsingborg och Göteborg - Allguna Design
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
60match
almstudio.se 🇸🇪
almstudio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
60match
alltietthemsida.se 🇸🇪
Start - alltietthemsida
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
abowdigital.se 🇸🇪
Abowdigital – Webbyrå för småföretag | Snabb hemsida på 7 dagar
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.