Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to peterlee.io

Peter Lee · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
alecpeters.info
Alec Peters
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewtruong.com
Notes and Code | notes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewbpeterson.dev
Andrew Peterson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
depietro.com
PETER DePIETRO New Media
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alexgrand.dev
Alex Grand
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
patpetersen.com
Pat Petersen -
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ajj8.org
Anjin Jung – Simple notes, thoughts
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nathaniel.ai
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nataren.io
César López-Natarén's homepage
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kiranlog.com
KiranLog – A log of thoughts, ideas, and experiences
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
derekdiamond.com
Software Visionary | Derek Diamonds Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
digitalsquid.co.uk 🇬🇧
Digitalsquid
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
aaron-brown.dev
Aaron Brown
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
aaron-brown.net
Aaron Brown
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
keywordsheeter.com
Keyword Sheeter - Free Keyword Ideas Tool
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
patriciobunt.com
Patricio Bunt
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
textlegend.com
Text Legend - Text Tools for Writers and Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ikamino.dev
eric lee
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.