Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to peterhellerauthor.com

Peter Heller's Homepage - Peter Heller · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
patriciaredican.com
Homepage - Patricia Redican
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
annaliubooks.com
Homepage - Anna Liu Books
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
sirwritealot.com
Homepage - sirwritealot
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
alexandermccallsmith.com
Homepage - Alexander McCall Smith
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
adamstoneentertainment.com
Homepage - AdamStone Entertainment LLC
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
narrivum.com
Narrivum - Homepage
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
denisearnault.com
Home Page - Personal Website
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
andrewbowie.net
Home Page - ANDREW BOWIE
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
angusdonaldbooks.com
Homepage - Angus Donald Books
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
adampeterson.net
HOME » Adam Peterson
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
adstarrling.com
Homepage | A.D. Starrling
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
amongtheokapi.com
John S. Taylor - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
nagasaki-thenovel.com
Landing Page - Nagasaki
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
paulgorry.com
Homepage 2025 - Paul Gorry
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
24postmarks.com
24Postmarks - Letter Subscriptions - Homepage
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
bethkanter.com
Home | Writer | Beth Kanter
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
naomisbooknook.com
MY SITE - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
paulinetait.com
Home - Pauline Tait
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.