Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to peterhauf.com

Peter Hauf Communication · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
maxspreen.com
Max Spreen Communication Design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
gu-co.com
Markendesign Nürnberg | Gumbrecht Communication
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
peterzec.com
Peter Zec
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
2ax.net
| ax. kommunikation + design
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
scicom-lab.de 🇩🇪
Science Communication Lab – Design Studio and Agency for Science Comunication
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
pfeifroth.de 🇩🇪
Pfeifroth Kommunikationsdesign
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
petersabath.com
PETER SABATH
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
steinejagd.de 🇩🇪
Inge Heyen ·· Visuelle Kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
a-stuerz.org
andreas stürz :: visuelle kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
pizzahaus-bernburg.de 🇩🇪
CHIC IDEA – Design & Kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
qrbranding.de 🇩🇪
CHIC IDEA – Design & Kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
projekt-il-art.de 🇩🇪
Büro Franck - Visuelle Kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
seinskreis.de 🇩🇪
bär und krieger kommunikation und design
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
5gradsued.com
5°sued Kommunikationsgestaltung+Produktdesign
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
aisdesign.info
ais.design | studio für design & kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
stefanie-schubert.de 🇩🇪
Stefanie Schubert – Kommunikationsdesignerin
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
rkushuber.de 🇩🇪
Markus Huber - Werkraum für visuelle Kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
boeglmueller.com
Böglmüller - Idee . Konzept . Grafik . Kommunikation
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.