Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to petercai.com

Peter Cai · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
ilter.dev
Ilter Cengiz
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
depietro.com
PETER DePIETRO New Media
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alecpeters.info
Alec Peters
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
pcredfern.com
Petter Charles Redfern
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
majingze.com
Jingze Ma | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
mandronov.com
Mikhail Mandronov
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
akshaysoni.net
Akshay Soni — Software Engineer / Leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alexgutierrez.tech
Alex Gutierrez — Software Engineer & Engineering Leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewbpeterson.dev
Andrew Peterson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
gocodemode.com
Gregory Monroe — Resume
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
patpetersen.com
Pat Petersen -
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aniltalla.com
Product and Engineering Leader - Anil Talla
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
chekalsky.com
👨‍💻 Ilya Chekalsky ∙ Илья Чекальский ∙ Ilia Chekalskii
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
bhornseth.com
Brandon Hornseth
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
khola.dev
Jakub Holak - Engineering Leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
khoile.dev
Khoi Le
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
bhassinger.com
Brian Hassinger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
deutelmoser.com
Menu
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.