Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pepatcha.com

PePatcha — Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
everybodyallatonce.com
Everybody-All-At-Once — Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
abhishekshukla.tech
Abhishek Shukla — Software Development Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
abhisheksaha.dev
Home — Abhishek Saha
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alansaldivar.dev
Saldivar Studio — Engineering Leadership & Product Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
gmatcha.com
gmatcha
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ifen.com
: Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
arduino.org
Arduino - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
1stvamp.org
Home — 1stvamp.org
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alexandreanicio.dev
aa dev | Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
artur.software
Artur S. — Full-Stack Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kireeti.dev
kireeti | Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
evanharmon.com
Evan Harmon — Almanac
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
avolo.tech
Avolo - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
chenpinyangdev.com
P.Y.CHEN - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ethangorman.com
Ethan Gorman — Product Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
iliakuzmin.dev
Ilia Kuzmin — Senior Delphi Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
pedromurinelo.com
Home — Pedro Murinelo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
anej.dev
anej — developer, tinkerer, builder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.