Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pennyhe.com

pennyHe (Penny He) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
agileos.net
agileos · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
avh.dev
avh-dev · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
namlini.com
namlini · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
denoncode.com
Denoncode (Denon Code) · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
makoteh.com
makoteh (MakoTeh) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
akshchand.com
akshchand (Aksh) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
ignitepaintball.com
matthewdurham · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
mangalitza.io
mangalitza-io · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
andrewhall.dev
andrewhall (Andrew Hall) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
aro.dev
ARO · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
imlucaslopes.com
ImLucasLopes (Lucas Lopes) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
eugenloncaric.com
eugenloncaric (Eugen Loncaric) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
andrewbmccullough.com
andrewbmccullough (Andrew McCullough) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
a-jd.dev
a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
awesomelist.net
awesome · GitHub Topics · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
gnaux.com
gnaux · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
imivi.dev
imivi · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
kiena.dev
Kiena · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.