Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to peneph.at

Philipp Peneder – Architektur & Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
miniform.at 🇦🇹
miniform, Architektur & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
architekten-ronacher.at 🇦🇹
Ronacher Architekten – Architektur der Mitte
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
anjakiermaier.com
Anja Kiermaier – Art Director & Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
mobileloft.at 🇦🇹
Studio FM – Architekturstudio Faruk Murat
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
mittempergher.at 🇦🇹
Naomi Mittempergher – Architektur | Theorie | Geschichte
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
studiolia.at 🇦🇹
STUDIO LIA – design + architecture
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
automat.at 🇦🇹
AUTOMAT | architektur & design | Eva Haas & Llewellen Heili
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
andreapfleger.com
andrea pfleger – design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
plan-es.com
PlanES – Stadtplanungs- und Architekturbüro
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
superwien.at 🇦🇹
superwien – architecture urbanism
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
labvert.at 🇦🇹
Labvert — Architecture & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
heydesignstudio.com
HEY! – Designstudio
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
moeller-architekten.com
architektur + kunst
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
super-ue.com
Kontext Architektur
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
studiocs.at 🇦🇹
StudioCS | Architecture & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
pmainzer.com
PHILIPP MAINZER | Office for architecture and design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
formdepot.at 🇦🇹
Architektur, Handwerk & Design • FORMDEPOT Wien
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
undform.de 🇩🇪
&form – Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.