similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to penearn.com

PenEarn — Write, Earn & Grow · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

2 shared topicsfiction

ilorisnovel.com

IlorisNovel — Write and read web fiction

2 shared topicsfiction

andreiawrites.com

Andréia Rosanova — Writer, Fiction & Creative Nonfiction

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

m huw evans — editor — writer — reader

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

armstrongsheila.com

sheila armstrong // writer

2 shared topicsfiction

kimlajevardi.com

kimlajevardi | This Writer's Growing

2 shared topicsfiction

Narralun — Where stories find their universe

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

awritershorrificrealization.com

A Writer's Horrific Realization — by Zoltan Kiss

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Ilya Kharkow - Writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

pattyohearn.com

Patty O'Hearn - Writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Bex Pachl | Writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Nan Monroe | Writer of Novels, Stories, and Radio Plays

2 shared topicsfiction

Steven Dexheimer | Writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Amy Landis | Writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

kinzawritex.com

Home - Kinza WriteX

2 shared topicsfiction

Kit Ingram, Writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

demillewriter.com

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kit Scriven – Writer

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.