Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to penchev.com

Ivan Penchev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
hopfield.com
Blog bazar of a frenchy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
juandiegopleitez.com
Juan Pleitez | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
simonlb.com
Simon Leboucher
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alexrs.me
:alejandro | Ideas and thoughts about software, computers and scalability.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
eijlnu.com
Julien Bisconti
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
eijlnu.dev
Julien Bisconti
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
terriblecode.com
terriblecode
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewkramer.dev
Build Artifacts with Andrew – Resources for DevOps and Software Engineers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
futurama.io
futurama
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
papasoft.com
This is the way... | Papasoft
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
albertp.dev
Albert Portnoy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alexschimpf.dev
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewtc.dev
andrewtc
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ashish.me
Ashish Patel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ashleylavery.com
Ashley Lavery - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
adityamohta.dev
Kumar Aditya Mohta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.