Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pelinzon.dev

Lucas Pelinzon · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
aalazz.me
Alexis Lazzarotto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
abuzer.tech
Abuzer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
annapapitto.com
Anna Papitto – Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
nathanielmugenyi.com
Nathaniel Mugenyi
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
natanfernandes.com
Natan Fernandes
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
pcamposu.com
Patricio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
artemsmikh.me
Artem Mikhailov | @artemsmikh
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
eventloopsoftware.com
Eventloop software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
managementuncensored.com
Welcome!
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
mancevice.dev
Alexander Mancevice
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
nathants.com
nathants - software engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
albaraamansour.dev
Al-Baraa Mansour
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
ilanbouhadana.com
Ilan Bouhadana
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
natesg.com
Nate Sanchez-Goodwin
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
angad.tech
Angad Misra - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
alexborisov.org
Alex Borisov
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
adamstirtan.net
Adam Stirtan
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
kisinski.com
KISINSKI — Software Engineering
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.