Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pelaxix.com

Pelaxix · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
sithiasma.com
Sithi Asma
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
renzhiyan.com
Zhiyan REN
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
kilo4.com
Kilo 4 Lab Notebook
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
acmiyaguchi.me
Anthony Miyaguchi's corner of the internet
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
thcopeland.com
Tom Copeland
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
arvindprakash.com
Arvind Prakash
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
desertdavid.com
./sharkey | Personal Site
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nathanpeet.com
Nathan's Notes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dentsuforge.com
Login | Dentsu Forge
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
devfiddle.com
DevFiddle - Developer Tools, Code Snippets & Articles
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ifpatel.com
Jignesh Patel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
naurolabs.com
nauroLabs — Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
adrian.my
Adrian Gan — Builder, Creator, Explorer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
kirinos.com
Kirinos Engineering
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
abingdondigital.co.uk 🇬🇧
Abingdon Digital
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andyisbomb.com
Andy Broyles — andyisbomb.com | Builder, Maker, Creator in Austin TX
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
pedrocurvo.com
Pedro Curvo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
thanosam.com
Thanos Amoutzias | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.