Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pedrorfdez.com

Pedro Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
pedroaquinoo.com
Pedro Aquino's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
devsofie.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
devonbray.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
kiannoctor.com
Kian's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
dev-shamim.com
Shamim Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
andriyoga.com
Andri Yoga | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
alexarraiza.dev
Alex's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
paulracisz.com
Paul Racisz | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
aryankashyap.com
Aryan's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
amirabasyouni.com
Amira's Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
anasalakkad.com
Anas Alakkad | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
andrewmcguckin.com
Andrew McGuckin - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
deploynext.com
Kemo Oolep · Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
devbychow.com
Alexander's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
aldodev.org
Aldo Lucchetta - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
manasagadepalli.com
Manasa Gadepalli - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
patrickjose.com
Patrick Jose Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
thanhorama.com
Thanh Tran | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.