Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pedrojimenezp.com

Pedro Jimenez · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
pedrovitor.com
Pedro Vitor
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
pedroochoa.dev
Pedro Ochoa
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
pedropregueiro.com
Pedro Pregueiro
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
sjimenez.dev
Santiago Jimenez Quintero | Tech Lead
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
pcanterini.com
Home • Pedro Canterini
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
rennangimenez.com
Rennan Gimenez | Senior SDET
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
pedroapfilho.com
Pedro Filho - Product Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pedropizzi.com
Pedro Pizzi - Computer Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pcunhadev.com
Pedro Cunha — Product Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
pedroluisarroyo.com
Pedro Arroyo | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ilher.dev
Pedro Reis — Fullstack developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
pedroep.com
Pedro Estevão - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
pedrojferreira.com
👋 | Hello, I'm Pedro Ferreira.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pedrozurita.com
Pedro Zurita | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
devpedro.com
Pedro Rangel | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
pedropetcov.com
Pedro Petcov — From Zero to Production
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
pedrohdsimoes.com
Pedro Simoes - Full Stack Engineer - pedrohdsimoes
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
developerjim.com
Developer Jim
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.