Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pecavalheiro.com

Pedro Cavalheiro · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
pedropiva.dev
Pedro Piva
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
pedrolaracuente.com
Pedro Laracuente
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pedrovinhas.com
logjourney • Pedro Henrique Vinhas
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
pedroni.dev
Lucas Pedroni - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
patryksienniak.com
Patryk Sienniak
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
cheesesense.com
芝士派 CHEESESENSE
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
im-banana.com
Im_Banana - About Me
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
rename-a-file.com
Unnamed Project
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
ann-mariekemp.com
A-M Kemp Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
arizz96.dev
arizz96 | Backend Ruby Engineer @ 1000Farmacie with a passion for simple, elegant, clean, scalable code.
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
andyfoster.net
Andy Foster | GitForked
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
renzocaina.com
Renzo Caiña, Full Stack Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
arycnn.tech
Aryan Potdar // Minecraft Bedrock Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
arycnn.dev
Aryan Potdar // Minecraft Bedrock Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
ethanh-dev.com
Ethan Ho | Personal Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
amwebdev.com
AM WebDev
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
beyond-wp.com
Beyond WP - Un-block your development knowledge
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
chaseaucoin.com
Chase Aucoin - Adventures in Coding
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.