Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pdsargent.com

Patricia Sargent · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
patriciabooks.com
Patricia Saunders
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
patricialeegauch.com
Patricia Lee Gauch
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
patriciasanchezbooks.com
Patricia Sanchez Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
patriciadailey.com
Patricia Dailey
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
patriciatoht.com
Patricia Toht - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
patriciaclough.com
Patricia Clough Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
patricianpress.com
Patrician Press
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
patriciasantomasso.com
PATRICIA SANTOMASSO - ABOUT ME
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
patriciaboysenauthor.com
Patricia Boysen Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
patricialipe.com
Patricia Lipe - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
patriciacamden.com
Patricia Camden - Welcome
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
patriciaaobrien.com
Patricia A. O'Brien - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
patriciajwilliams.com
Home - Patricia J. Williams
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
patriciaprijatel.com
Patricia Prijatel – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
patriciaelzietuttle.com
Patricia Elzie-Tuttle Website
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
patriciaelzie.com
Patricia Elzie-Tuttle Website
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
patriciavonjohnson.com
Patricia Von Johnson – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
patriciareding.com
PatriciaReding.com - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.